Investment

» Moonlight - Cacs now over $7 (Hope I don't jinx it!)

In response to Cacs now over $7 (Hope I don't jinx it!) posted by Kirk:

Cacs, Yeaaaaa, Almost every day lately my portfolio has gone up to what amounts to a lovely daily paycheck $720.00 just now with just Cacs. What a country. My subscrition to your newsletter Kirk has really paid off. I only do a small portion of it, but it works for me.

-- posted by Moonlight

» Moonlight - Chrystal Ball,

I would have replied earlier but had my husband in the hospital for 3 days. I fired last Dr. New Dr.new treatment and it's already better and we are on our way in the right direction.

-- posted by Moonlight

» doctorj2 - CACS: Good Trading Stock

I first bought CACS at $11.09 back on 2/20/04. A few weeks earlier it had been about $18/sh. Kept buying more all the way down to $5.91 (8/6/04). It then ran up over $10 in November and December 2004 and I sold 1/3 of my shares at just under $10. Bought them back (+300sh) in May & June of '05 at $4.80 & $4.30. Added another 700sh this past January at $4.75. Then sold 500sh 4/10 at $7.625 and another 500sh 3 days later at $8.22. Bought 500sh back on 6/13 at $7.24 and another 500sh 7/13 at $6.95 and sold 1000sh on 8/30 at $9.16. Bought them back on 9/6 at $6.41 & $5.84.

At today's close ($7.10) CACS is still down 36% from when I started buying it. Despite CACS being lower overall I've done okay by buying low and lower and selling high. I'm now 38% in the black with CACS and looking to take some more profits if we can get another day or two like today. Go CACS!!!

-- posted by doctorj2

» Moonlight - Unbelievable.

CACS up 5.92% just today. Yesterday my overall portfolio made more in one day than ever before. And followed by another up day. Hope Abbey Joseph Cohn and BB are both correct. I heard her say 1460

-- posted by Moonlight

» TonyFromGlendale - Making money with CACS

Note to Kirk...THANKS for CACS! I have been buying and selling at a profit CACS (and LRCX) following your guidelines in your newsletter for some time now. This week I sold 1,000 shares of CACS I had bought at 46 cents beating by the way your buy price of 49 cents. (Don't want you to forget that!)Total gain on this purchase and sale at $7.50 was $7,019.86.
I would say that this was quite a winner!
Thanks 7,020 times. You certainly have made me a lot more money than Brinker.

-- posted by TonyFromGlendale

» Moonlight - re: Making money with CACS

In response to re: Making money with CACS posted by Kirk:

Me too, I just sold 2000 shares of cacs I bot Sept 9th. made 30% I had a order in to sell at 7.50 but the provider was down so I called C. Schwab to see if they had sold and she told me no their were buyers at 7.49 so I asked if she could change my order and she did and they sold right away. The Lord was with me cause at 7,50 they might still be mine. Kirk, thanks again.

-- posted by Moonlight

» dlfjr - Delayed order?

Anyone have any insight on whether the (Verizon) order is going to happen Q4?

-- posted by dlfjr

» doctorj2 - Delayed order?

In response to Delayed order? posted by dlfjr:

Looks like some orders fell thorugh as CACS said it will have a larger 4th quarter loss than previously estimated and less revenue. Looks like it might take a 10% or greater haircut this morning at the open. I wonder if Kirk thinks this will be a buying opportunity????

-- posted by doctorj2

» Moonlight - re: Delayed order?

In response to re: Delayed order? posted by Kirk:

Kirk, Baracuda spam did not contain your recent message on CACS. I called ISP and you are on the white list to have your messages delivered. Please resend your message. It should come through now. Thanks

-- posted by Moonlight

» Jas_Jain - Isn't This Company a Perfect Example of a Scam?

--

I don't follow this company, but Kirk brought this to my attention few years back. I think it was trading around $10. Regardless, the Scam has been trading mostly $5-10 and has severely under-performed other Silly.con Scams.

Did they pay any dividend that I am not aware of? Isn't the company beiong run so that insiders can keep selling the Scams to the public?

Just curious,

Jas

PS: I realize that Kirk is a trading genius and it doesn't matter what one trades as long as it has lot of volatility. You must agree that there have to be a constant supply of suckers out there who buy near the highs so that Kirk can sell near the top and then wait to buy back at the bottom.

-- posted by Jas_Jain