« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next »
» allancoleman - taxes
In response to taxes posted by Happy_2:
My steep price was approximately 14 cents , effective tax rate of 14% , on every dollar of my Roth conversion of over a $100k this year ( 2006 ) . My Roths will pass taxfree to my heirs when I surf my last wave .
The answer to your last question is probably yes . My intent is to convert all my deferred accounts to Roths while I'm a resident of Alaska , a taxfree income tax state . Hawaii doesn't tax Roth distributions as they are taxfree forever in all states .
-- posted by allancoleman
» allancoleman - taxes
In response to taxes posted by Happy_2:
Although $14,000 sounds like alot of dollars today , Happy_2 , with my critical mass , it would be higher if I were required to take my RMD now without done all the Roth conversions I've done in the past since they were first allowed . And when I pull another double in eight years by the time I'm 70 , my RMD could be well over $185k a year and could have been as high as $300k if I didn't already begin this Roth conversion strategy years ago .
And although I agree at our age , three years is a long time , If I don't do these Roth conversions NOW in these lower tax brackets , I will be in the highest tax bracket FOREVER at RMD age . Sometimes too much money can be a problem . But a good problem .
. With my Roth conversion strategy , I hope to be the first multi - millionaire that pays NO taxes , legally .
-- posted by allancoleman
» lcha - taxes
In response to taxes posted by allancoleman:Never underestimate the ability of the mediocore masses to confiscate wealth from the industrious few.
-- posted by lcha
» allancoleman - taxes
In response to taxes posted by lcha:
Appreciate your concern , Icha , but until " they " ' fix ' this situation , I'll keep paying taxes at these lower tax rates every year on a portion of my deferred accounts until I reach RMD age when it'll be much more difficult to keep myself in a lower tax bracket .
Recent studies done by AAII suggest that it may actually be beneficial for tax payers over the age of 70 with RMD to also do Roth conversions .
After having to deal with AMT in the past , I have found it easy to invest in such a manner that I have not had to deal with it again . ![]()
If the " mediocore masses " subject us to paying taxes on our Roths , I'll deal with it at that time along with the rest of the " industrious few " .
-- posted by allancoleman
» allancoleman - taxes on High Net Worth
In response to taxes on High Net Worth posted by Kirk:
Good morning , Capt. ,
Wish you could find a reliable reference to that discussion by Hillary and Laura too about taxing Roths . The Roth message board I also frequent couldn't find such a reference either . ? ?
In the meanwhile I have converted to Roths over 22% of my Total asset base and over 44% of my deferred invested portfolio ( 401k & IRAs ) and expect to increase that in the future until i come under RMD and I'll have to look at the tax rate structure at that time and see if " they " have ' fixed ' the problem . ![]()
Hope you'll stay in contact when you hit the beach and waves further south .
p.s. and for those interested , the deadline for Roth conversions is the end of the calendar year , December 31st , and NOT April 15th as contributory Roths . And a year lost can never be recovered and the increasing amounts of your deferred accounts will just make your RMD worse later . One fellow on that Roth message board that was close to RMD age had over 8 million in his deferred accounts I believe and was asking help on what to do . It's rather late at that time .
-- posted by allancoleman
» allancoleman - HSAs even better next year
The president just signed legislation making HSAs even better :http://www.treas.gov/press/releases/hp20...
Enjoy . ![]()
I will mail / make my $6,450 maximum deposit for 2007 the end of next week to give me over $14k in my taxfree HSA account for use to pay my medical expenses , and even extended Medicare costs , later in the future if necessary .
-- posted by allancoleman
» rice1 - HSAs even better next year
In response to HSAs even better next year posted by allancoleman:
This is great news Allan. Looks like I will increase my contribution from $4000 (family deductable) to the maximum contribution limit of $5650 for year 2007. The inflation indexing is a good idea too.
Eric
-- posted by rice1
» allancoleman - HSAs even better next year
In response to HSAs even better next year posted by rice1:
Yes , it is excellent news , Eric . I wish I had figured out that I qualified for them sooner and that they were allowed AFTER Medicare age of 65 .
ALSO don't forget that if you're over 55 , you can also contribute an additional $800 for 2007 , Eric . $5,650 plus that $800 brings my total HSA deposit for next year ( 2007 ) up to $6,450 .
As soon as I've completed my tax return early next year , I'll give a full post here how much my deposit for this tax year ( 2006 ) saved me on my return .
-- posted by allancoleman
» allancoleman - Another HSA message board
http://benefitslink.com/boards/index.php...
In reading through the archives of this message board , I've figured a long term strategy of how to continue putting money into a HSA for us after I'm 65 in 2009 and qualify for Medicare and no longer can deposit money into our family HSA . We'll open a single HSA in my wife's name and make a couple years worth of deposits in her name , probably over $8k by that time , before she is 65 on Medicare , and get more money into these excellent health care vehicles , before we both are locked out of them .
Please feel free to ask your HSA questions here too . But it is nice to have another " opinion " on HSA issues . Because the more I study and utilize HSAs , the more I realize how complicated they can be for some folks with different personal issues and medical plans . And , as usual , the federal government and the IRS can really overly complicate something .
-- posted by allancoleman
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next »
Please follow the guidelines set forth in the Suite101 Posting Etiquette when adding to the discussion.