|
||||||
Are all markets now ruled by irrational emotions? Are the days of predicting trends by drawing intricate graphs gone forever?
With the major banks improving their market share way beyond their own expectations, and this despite them reducing mortgage broker commissions and not passing on the full Reserve Bank of Australia rate decreases, they can be forgiven for thinking that Christmas definitely came early this year. In fact they have re-written all existing marketing philosophies by currently experiencing their strongest market position for 15 years (Financial Review Newspaper). If any other business had treated its market channel and clients in this manner then conventional wisdom would have them drastically losing market share. So what is their secret? Emotions In The MarketFear. Customers have been frightened by news of non-banks and banks in the US closing their doors. This has led them to react in the same way market investors do when the stock market plummets. Investors shift to gold, and the price of gold has risen sharply in recent times. Mums and Dads shifted to banks, as they perceive them as being "gold" in these troubled times. This perception was given a massive boost by the Australian Federal Government’s recent bank deposit guarantee. Some non-bank lenders have only reinforced this perception by pulling out of the residential mortgage market. Are Markets Now Emotion Driven?This raises a significant question: Do markets react according to the release of factual market-based information, or are they ruled by the collective emotion of investors? To analyse this question properly would take several hundred pages of theory, tables, and time-line analysis. In the interests of time, suffice it to say that the stock, property and commodity markets respond to the collective majority of expectations of investors. That is, if the majority of investors expect the price of a particular stock to increase, they buy that stock and the price goes up, thereby fulfilling their expectations. The reverse applies (as we have unfortunately witnessed during the preceding months) when investors expect a stock price to fall. They start selling, and the price starts dropping which fuels more selling. Again, expectations are fulfilled. Of course, these investors have to sell their stock to someone, and these "someone’s" obviously believe the stock price will rise otherwise they would not buy it. However, because these investors are in the "minority of expectations" their purchases of the stock are far smaller and therefore unable to stop the slide in its price. More sellers than buyers, as any analyst will tell you, points to a stock price falling. Mums and Dads are the same. If the majority of them believe house prices will increase then they will look to purchase investment properties. This leads to more buyers than sellers, which leads to competitive buying activity and more vocal auctions, putting pressure on prices which therefore increase. This can be called the "Majority of Expectations" rule. The "Majority Of Expectations" RuleYou can analyse line charts, candle-sticks, graph trends and so on but it is the collective emotion of investors and public that cause market movements. Remove all negative news, written and electronic, and market confidence would increase. This would prove this "Majority of Expectations" rule, but unfortunately will not occur.
The copyright of the article Are Markets Driven By Facts Or Emotion? in Investment is owned by Craig Pickering. Permission to republish Are Markets Driven By Facts Or Emotion? in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||